饥饿游戏
机票退改新标准计划年内出台，要求平台在旅客支付前主动公示退改费率_我的网站
A | Session reviews work in 1st half of 2026, calls for strengthened political oversight China's top anti-graft body has vowed to advance discipline inspection and supervision work with higher standards and more concrete measures in the second half of 2026, focusing on strengthening political oversight, combating grassroots corruption and enhancing coordination among supervisory bodies. The sixth plenary session of the 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing on Saturday. Li Xi, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and secretary of the CCDI, addressed the session. The session reviewed work carried out in the first half of the year and called for steadfastly following the Chinese path to combating corruption while promoting high-quality development of discipline inspection and supervision. In the first half of this year, authorities nationwide filed 538,000 cases and punished 412,000 people, according to the CCDI and the National Commission of Supervision. CCDI plenary sessions are generally held at the beginning of a year, but may also be convened midyear for major matters, interim reviews, personnel elections or to implement major decisions of the CPC Central Committee. The session emphasized the importance of maintaining a correct view of performance and strengthening political oversight. It called for deepening political inspections, strictly enforcing discipline in leadership transitions and consistently improving conduct. The session called for enforcing discipline, combating corruption and continuing concentrated rectification of misconduct and corruption at the people's doorsteps, in order to ensure the high-quality completion of all tasks for the year. Tasks closely connected Ji Yaping, a professor at Northwest University of Political Science and Law, said these tasks are closely connected. Political oversight should focus on whether officials truly follow a people-centered approach, implement central decisions, work pragmatically and respect objective laws, rather than pursue vanity projects or emphasize statements over results. Oversight itself should also avoid formalism and instead focus on effectiveness, Ji said. Yang Weidong, a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said this year is both the start of the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-30) and a year when local leadership transitions are taking place, making implementation of central decisions and prevention of risks during personnel changes particularly important. Ji from Northwest University of Political Science and Law said that supervision during leadership transitions should ensure officials are selected according to standards of integrity and competence, while procedures remain lawful, transparent and subject to public oversight. The meeting also called for continued concentrated rectification of misconduct and corruption affecting people's daily lives. Experts said that punishment should be combined with prevention, with greater emphasis on regulating the exercise of grassroots power. Ji said that oversight should cover the authorization, exercise and supervision of power throughout the process to reduce opportunities for abuse. Li Zhiwei, a lecturer at China University of Political Science and Law's School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, said the effectiveness of grassroots anti-corruption work should not be measured simply by the number of cases handled, but also by whether the number of recurring problems declines, governance improves and people see tangible benefits. Better coordination urged Additionally, the session emphasized systematic and bottom-line thinking, calling for better coordination among different forms of supervision. Experts said the discipline inspection authorities' work should be supervised by people's congresses, government departments and judicial, auditing and financial authorities, as well as the public and the media, so that different supervisory mechanisms reinforce rather than duplicate one another. Yang said such coordination should also help identify deeper institutional and governance problems through individual cases and prevent similar misconduct from recurring. The meeting also called for stronger internal oversight and continued efforts to make discipline inspection and supervision more standardized, law-based and regularized. In the first half of the year, 1,685 discipline inspection and supervision officials were placed under investigation and 1,535 were punished. Experts said that stronger self-supervision should be matched by better professional training, practical experience and internal checks. Ji called for narrowing capability gaps across regions and guarding against outside interference. 
。
B | 8 月 26 日消息，据人民日报今日报道，针对旅客关注的机票退改服务痛点，中国航空运输协会正在牵头制定机票退改专项团体标准，计划今年内正式发布实施，要求所有售票平台、航空公司官方渠道必须通过醒目字体、弹窗强制提示、专属标识、前置告知等方式，在旅客支付订单前主动公示退改费率、限制条件、免费退改场景，保障旅客知情权、选择权。此外，已有航空公司率先优化了退改签政策，中国东方航空 8 月初发布新版《国内客票自愿退票和自愿变更实施细则》，对于 2026 年 8 月 6 日（含）以后销售的 2026 年 8 月 6 日（含）以后开始旅行的国内客票，所有舱位提前 14 天自愿变更或自愿退票均免费（此前为提前 30 天）。注意到，近日一则“1.5 万元机票退票仅退 400 多元”的消息近期登上热搜。消费者林先生在购票平台花费 15,217 元订购了一张国际机票，因行程变动，于起飞前三天申请退票，结果发现实际仅退回 432 元。事件经央视财经等媒体报道后，7 月 28 日上午，林先生陆续收到两笔退款 —— 一笔 12,000 余元、一笔 2,000 余元，合计 14,700 余元，加上此前已退的 432 元，15217 元票款全额到账。7 月 30 日，携程就相关情况及服务规则发布公开说明，表示本次机票最终退款，并非通用退票政策调整，也非平台破例优待，而是依据携程六重服务保障办理的标准化个案。携程透露，长期以来携程在机票预订、退票全流程，针对退改规则、可退金额、扣费标准等关键信息均设置专属说明与醒目强提醒。央视财经表示，为什么要收那么高的退票费，原因是什么？没有任何解释，对消费者来说还是一笔糊涂账。全国人大代表和全国政协委员在接受采访时表示，他们为了改变这个霸王条款在 2024 年两会期间就提出了整改建议，有关部门说“回去研究”，两年过去了，局面还是没有改善，相关行业协会和航空公司更是装聋作哑，没有丝毫改变。图源：Pexels。
Current article:http://4x3s.licuqiangraosuiheizhua.pics/vbpo/btk.html
Published on:06:50:19
